Post Reply 
Booth signature--authentic?
03-05-2016, 02:06 AM
Post: #1
Booth signature--authentic?
I got this a few years ago and was assured of its authenticity, but a Lincoln letter I got at the same time has been declared fraudulent by the Papers of Abraham Lincoln experts. I would appreciate opinions from this site. Thanks, Bill

[Image: qmudsn.jpg]
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
03-05-2016, 06:39 AM
Post: #2
RE: Booth signature--authentic?
Welcome to the forum, Bill! This is not an area where I have expertise in, but I am afraid I have to vote "no."
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
03-05-2016, 08:09 AM (This post was last modified: 03-05-2016 08:09 AM by Eva Elisabeth.)
Post: #3
RE: Booth signature--authentic?
Welcome, Bill - you may find this thread interesting:
http://rogerjnorton.com/LincolnDiscussio...l#pid25436
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
03-05-2016, 08:55 AM
Post: #4
RE: Booth signature--authentic?
Bill:

Neither am I an expert, but an intelligent guess is that it is not genuine. I compared it with Booth's unquestionably authentic signature on the card he left in Browning's box for Johnson. There are major differences. To begin with, the card is signed "J. Wilkes Booth", not "John Wilkes Booth". Secondly, the "k" in "Wilkes" is substantially different, as is the capital "B" in "Booth". The underscoring line in your sample does not appear on the card, though there is a subscription. There are other differences of a subtler kind.

John
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
03-05-2016, 02:34 PM
Post: #5
RE: Booth signature--authentic?
I have to agree with the others for reasons stated. It is still a notable item in that it is not authentic.

Bill Nash
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
03-06-2016, 01:49 AM
Post: #6
RE: Booth signature--authentic?
Thanks, all.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
03-11-2016, 10:51 AM
Post: #7
RE: Booth signature--authentic?
There are more spurious John Wilkes Booth and Abraham Lincoln signatures in existence than the real deal. Much of them were the work of Eugene Field II back in the 20's and 30's. However this does not look like the work of Field.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
03-11-2016, 11:29 AM
Post: #8
RE: Booth signature--authentic?
Jim's comment got me curious, so I Yahoo'd Eugene Field.
Here is a bit more information regarding what Jim just posted.

http://www.autograph-market.com/books-a-...y-mr-field

So when is this "Old Enough To Know Better" supposed to kick in?
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
04-09-2016, 03:30 PM
Post: #9
RE: Booth signature--authentic?
I would be reluctant to purchase any historical signature without there being some provenance to back it up. I have watched too many episodes of Pawn Stars!
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)