Post Reply 
** NEW DISCOVERY REGARDING BOOTH AUTOPSY PHOTO
06-18-2013, 10:19 AM
Post: #64
RE: ** NEW DISCOVERY REGARDING BOOTH AUTOPSY PHOTO
Quote:Barry and I will be selling a supplement documenting the Gardner article as well as providing supporting evidence. We are having it proofread right now and hope to have it available in the next couple of weeks.

We don't prove that James A. Wardell did not exist, but we do state that the name wasn't registered in the Washington DC area with the national census at the time it should have been. We also point out at least 4 potential "red-flags" or errors in the account.

As for motive in putting it in one's book, I think Katz did it to help move product. I also don't believe a word about Oldroyd having anything to do with it. That was also a fabrication.

Thanks John. How does one go about purchasing these supplements?

((( | '€ :} |###] -- }: {/ ]
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
RE: ** NEW DISCOVERY REGARDING BOOTH AUTOPSY PHOTO - Hess1865 - 05-30-2013, 04:16 PM
RE: ** NEW DISCOVERY REGARDING BOOTH AUTOPSY PHOTO - Rhatkinson - 06-10-2013, 04:56 PM
RE: ** NEW DISCOVERY REGARDING BOOTH AUTOPSY PHOTO - wsanto - 06-18-2013 10:19 AM
RE: ** NEW DISCOVERY REGARDING BOOTH AUTOPSY PHOTO - Hess1865 - 06-28-2013, 11:31 PM
RE: ** NEW DISCOVERY REGARDING BOOTH AUTOPSY PHOTO - Rhatkinson - 07-12-2013, 09:23 PM
RE: ** NEW DISCOVERY REGARDING BOOTH AUTOPSY PHOTO - Rhatkinson - 07-12-2013, 10:09 PM
RE: ** NEW DISCOVERY REGARDING BOOTH AUTOPSY PHOTO - Rhatkinson - 07-24-2013, 07:05 PM
RE: ** NEW DISCOVERY REGARDING BOOTH AUTOPSY PHOTO - Hess1865 - 07-24-2013, 09:11 PM

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)