New Search - HELP

[Pamela]

(08-03-2016 09:45 AM)L Verge Wrote:  

(08-03-2016 12:51 AM)Pamela Wrote:  Thanks for that information , Laurie. So, Richards didn't destroy Parker's files, as Roger theorized, to cover the "fact" that he didn't witness the assassination. Neither did Richards have a "revelation" 20 or 30 years later that he was in Ford's. He was on the record at the time. Stewart could not tell a consistent story about Richards. In one trial he went to the police station and talked to Richards right after the assassination. In another trial he waited outside the offices until he was told by an officer to come back the next day. Stewart lied about Richards like he lied about almost catching Booth.

I can only speak for what I saw forty years ago on a few Xeroxed pages that appeared to be from the Parker files. Until I see a full copy (or miraculously, the original), I'm not ruling anything out.

As for the rest of your statement here, you are taking mighty leaps based on a very little bit of information that I provided as to the existence of the files - not what was in them. You are falling into the same pit that many of us have in the past -- making snap judgments without sufficient evidence to back them up.

I'm going to ask a question here that I hope won't insult you, but would you be so interested in Richards if he was not in "cahoots" with the Weichmann story?

Can you explain your "cahoots" question? I know what the word means.