New Search - HELP

[Pamela]

Susan, again, Richards knew that Grant wasn't in the theater in 1885 when he made the statement. Why isn't it reasonable to believe that he thought, at the time, that Grant was in the theater, though he didn't see him, since Grant was supposed to be there? The fact that he said he thought Grant had been shot, is more suggestive of an honest recollection of his experience than a fabrication. Do you really think that Richards was such a noodle head that he was unaware of Grant's absence in 1885? Do you know that Richards didn't tell a prosecutor about his visit to the Surratt house? Why wasn't Richards called to testify in the conspiracy trial? There were many things he could have testified about.