Post Reply 
Mudds aim to clear name of doc who treated Lincoln killer
09-14-2017, 08:57 PM
Post: #39
RE: Mudds aim to clear name of doc who treated Lincoln killer
(09-14-2017 08:18 PM)Steve Wrote:  
(07-19-2015 04:08 PM)L Verge Wrote:  Booth comes to Southern Maryland with letters of introduction from Canadian exiles. Those letters direct him to Dr. William Queen and Dr. Samuel Mudd. Dr. Queen gets word to Dr. Mudd to come to a Catholic church outside of his own parish (frowned upon in those days) to meet with Booth - supposedly under the guise of Booth looking to buy land and maybe a horse (the latter of which Dr. Mudd does acquire for him). Otherwise, Dr. Mudd claims that his land is all they discussed. And yet, Dr. Mudd did not own his farm - his father still owned it.

Dr. Queen is elderly and dies shortly before the assassination, but in the fall of 1864, Queen had at least a son-in-law who could have squired Booth around the neighborhood in developing plans; but it is Mudd who introduces Booth to Thomas Harbin and also to John Surratt, Jr., and from there the Southern Maryland role in at least the kidnapping begins to grow. If that doesn't indicate involvement, at least in the beginning....

We can fast forward to the well-known history of what occurred with Dr. Mudd and his rendering assistance to Booth and Herold for over twelve hours, his reluctance to notify authorities, etc. I do not think that Mudd knew of the assassination until the fugitives arrived at his door, but the evidence leading up to that point makes him at least liable for conspiracy.

I have known members of the Mudd families my entire life and have been friends with those who have fought the good fight. They know my feelings and that my greatest argument is that they try too hard to disavow their Southern Maryland heritage of the Civil War when Dr. Mudd's feelings are well covered in his letters to his wife and his rantings to the Catholic journalist Orestes Browning. I do applaud their tenacity, however.

BTW: Gen. Tidwell and Mr. Hall thought they had found evidence of a third doctor in Southern Maryland with whom Booth could make contact -- a Dr. Garland. There was a Dr. Garland in St. Mary's County (again Southern Maryland), but from what we could find, he might have been the Dr. Garland that went to Richmond and served Jefferson Davis as a doctor during the war. We were never able to make the connection however.

Laurie,
Do you have any more information on the Dr. Garland who served as a doctor for Jefferson Davis in Richmond?

There must have been more found at that time, but I turned my notes over to Mr. Hall and never heard anything more. I've been online this evening trying to reconstruct my thoughts, but the brain is drained.

P.S. It hasn't helped the brain today that I had a conversation with a researcher who has claims that would turn the assassination story as we know it completely on its ear... It screwed up my thought processes for the next week!
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
RE: Mudds aim to clear name of doc who treated Lincoln killer - L Verge - 09-14-2017 08:57 PM

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)