** NEW DISCOVERY REGARDING BOOTH AUTOPSY PHOTO

[John E.]

(05-30-2013 05:47 PM)Dave Taylor Wrote:  John, I think the Lawrence Gardner account is valuable. Before this, the scale of the "Booth autopsy photograph" weighed in favor of its existence. With this account, I see it being balanced, if not a bit closer to the "does not exist" side.

The Lawrence Gardner account helps balance the scale, but I'd need a bit more than this to truly tip it to the "never happened" side. Find a source that gives credence to Lawrence Gardner's words and that'll help considerably.

Hey Dave, why was the scale of the "Booth autopsy photograph" in favor of its existence? What evidence are you basing that on? What is the value of the source of this evidence ?

That's exactly the approach I took to forming my own opinion and this last piece of evidence solidified my view. Barry took on your role as Devil's Advocate and continued to challenge me on my opinions and findings. We work very well that way.

This is a case-closed for me and I will gladly accept that I'm wrong when someone shows me a photo of Booth in death. I tend to question things a lot but this is one of those times that I'm putting my foot down and saying definitively that the photo was NEVER taken.

Our supplement breaks down the evidence supporting the existence of an autopsy photograph and exposes its flaws.