Post Reply 
Lincoln's Unconstitutional Actions
01-05-2018, 04:24 PM
Post: #16
RE: Lincoln's Unconstitutional Actions
(01-05-2018 10:45 AM)RJNorton Wrote:  As I look back upon the nation's history I am sometimes surprised at what the Supreme Court finds constitutional.

For example, during World War I, Congress passed and President Wilson signed the Sedition Act in 1918.

From the Sedition Act:

"SECTION 3. Whoever, when the United States is at war, shall willfully make or convey false reports or false statements with intent to interfere with the operation or success of the military or naval forces of the United States, or to promote the success of its enemies, or shall willfully make or convey false reports, or false statements, . . . or incite insubordination, disloyalty, mutiny, or refusal of duty, in the military or naval forces of the United States, or shall willfully obstruct . . . the recruiting or enlistment service of the United States, or . . . shall willfully utter, print, write, or publish any disloyal, profane, scurrilous, or abusive language about the form of government of the United States, or the Constitution of the United States, or the military or naval forces of the United States . . . or shall willfully display the flag of any foreign enemy, or shall willfully . . . urge, incite, or advocate any curtailment of production . . . or advocate, teach, defend, or suggest the doing of any of the acts or things in this section enumerated and whoever shall by word or act support or favor the cause of any country with which the United States is at war or by word or act oppose the cause of the United States therein, shall be punished by a fine of not more than $10,000 or imprisonment for not more than twenty years, or both...."

In 1919 the Supreme Court upheld the Sedition Act by a vote of 7-2.

Another example came during World War II. On February 19, 1942, President Roosevelt signed Executive Order 9066, which resulted in the forcible internment of 120,000 people of Japanese ancestry. More than two-thirds of those interned under the Executive Order were citizens of the United States. The War Relocation Authority was created to administer the assembly centers, relocation centers, and internment camps, and relocation of Japanese-Americans began in April 1942. Internment camps were scattered all over the interior West, in isolated areas of Arizona, California, Utah, Idaho, Colorado, and Wyoming.

In 1944 the Supreme Court upheld the government by a vote of 6-3.

The Sedition Act of 1918 was an extension of the Espionage Act passed in 1917, as the U.S. entered WWI, and both were designed as wartime measures (I think) to protect our country from radical elements that would undermine our system of government and our efforts to win the war. One of the radicals caught by the Act was Eugene V. Debs. He appealed to the Supreme Court, but they upheld his conviction.

I leave understanding the Constitution to smarter people than I, but there must be a clause somewhere in there that allows seemingly drastic measures to protect our country. I believe that the Espionage Act is still on the books -- and frankly, I would not mind seeing both acts used against some of the forces working against us today. I believe that the protection of our country has taken some severe hits over the past decade or so. Just my opinion, and I was raised in a time when the protection of the majority - not the minority - was of utmost consideration.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
RE: Lincoln's Unconstitutional Actions - L Verge - 01-05-2018 04:24 PM

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)