New Development in Booth Case Coming Soon
|
07-19-2019, 05:35 PM
Post: #170
|
|||
|
|||
RE: New Development in Booth Case Coming Soon
(07-19-2019 04:53 PM)L Verge Wrote: Somewhere, I'm thinking that I have seen the height of 6'1" mentioned about the mummy. I'll drink some ginseng tea to see if that helps me remember!! If the mummy was 6' 1", and the wanted posters for JWB say he was 5' 8" tall obviously they can't be the same person, even beyond the many reasons we already know. The final reason I am seeking is definite proof in census records, etc as to exactly who David E. George was. George Rainey, a former postmaster in Enid, OK claimed that he was, in fact, David E. George, but didn't share a name for the granddaughter Mr Rainey communicated with in MS, nor a bank name in TX where nephew Willie George worked as a banker. I'm not seeing a banker Willie/William/Will* George in census records as a banker in TX. If George Rainey had proof he should have shared more information. I want to believe him; however, I haven't found a suitable David George in 1850-60 census records to fill the bill. I did notice that Oakland University in Detroit does have a folder for George Rainey, "Rainey, Geo. folder 9". There were letters exchanged between George Rainey and others concerning David E. George. None seems to have turned up online. At least I haven't found them. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 9 Guest(s)