Identification of Booth's body

[Gene C]

(12-29-2018 03:44 PM)mikegriffith1 Wrote:  You guys can keep ignoring the scientifically problematic aspects of the two so-called "identifications" of the body as Booth, but that won't make them go away.

One, the two people you refer to that stated the body was freckled also clearly stated the body was Booth's.
The "freckles" don't prove anything, because that "evidence" is surpassed by a clear and definitive identification of the body by the same witness.

Three, Boyd was 41. So what. So what if the body looked older to Dr. May than the last time he saw it.
Dr May still states clearly the body was Booth's.

I see no need to go further with your speculation, when you haven't overcome this first hurdle in your discussion.