Post Reply 
Booth's Denial of Foreknowledge of the Attack on Seward
12-28-2018, 11:27 AM
Post: #10
RE: Booth's Denial of Foreknowledge of the Attack on Seward
(12-27-2018 05:00 PM)mikegriffith1 Wrote:  
(12-27-2018 03:48 PM)L Verge Wrote:  As far as Booth's "regretting" what had happened at the Seward household, I believe that he was referring to the severe injuries made to other people besides the Secretary of State.
That's a novel interpretation. The logical, plain-sense interpretation is that he was referring to the attack on Seward. Otherwise, we would expect that he would have specified that he was referring only to what was done to the other people in the house.

From David Herold’s statement to Assistant Judge Advocate John Bingham aboard the ironclad warship, Montauk, April 27, 1865:

“We then heard there was a $10,000 reward offered for Booth, and that Secretary Seward was killed. That was on Monday, and I was told so by a negro, who said that Secretary Seward and two of his sons had been killed. Booth then made the remark that he was very sorry for the sons, but he only wished to God Seward had been killed…”
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
RE: Booth's Denial of Foreknowledge of the Attack on Seward - Dave Taylor - 12-28-2018 11:27 AM

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 6 Guest(s)