His Name Is Mudd

[Gene C]

(12-18-2018 04:07 PM)mikegriffith1 Wrote:  Nor can you explain how nobody on the Montauk could see a resemblance between the photos of Booth and the body they were viewing, when Rollins had no problem recognizing the man on crutches as the man in the Booth photo that Conger/Baker showed him less than 48 hours before Booth was supposedly shot. Maybe one day you'll venture to explain what in the world happened between the time Rollins was shown a picture of Booth and recognized him as the man on crutches and the time Booth's alleged body was viewed on the Montauk.

Nobody? Get real!
The witnesses on the Montauk didn't need a photograph to compare to the body for identification, they had seen Booth when he was alive
We have already shown on another thread (Identification of Booth's Body) how you have deliberately twisted , taken out of context, and misrepresented Dr. May's testimony when he identified Booth's body on the Montauk. You have used the same tactics when discussing Booth's diary. You are doing it again here.

You are quick to repeat and point out the problems in identifying the body, because if credible witnesses identify the body as Booth, which they did, then your theory that Booth wasn't killed in the barn at Garrett's goes up in smoke.