Identification of Booth's body
|
12-15-2018, 05:01 PM
(This post was last modified: 12-15-2018 05:51 PM by Steve.)
Post: #242
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Identification of Booth's body
(12-15-2018 02:23 PM)RJNorton Wrote:(12-13-2018 09:05 PM)mikegriffith1 Wrote: * Luther Baker did not take off with the man in the barn’s body for several hours for no reason. The Booth-escaped theory does not require us to ignore this bizarre, extremely suspicious event. Rather, we can plausibly theorize that Baker had a very important reason for taking off with the body: to change the clothing, to break the body’s left fibula near the ankle, to slightly burn the back of the body’s neck if necessary (unless the body happened to have a scar on the back of its neck), and possibly to write the initials JWB on one of the hands. Yes, ecchymosis/bruising can occur after death, but depending on the situation can have a different appearance (the author of the 2001 article below uses the term "pseudo-bruising" for post-mortem bruising): https://jcp.bmj.com/content/54/5/348 Notice, Dr. Barnes used the term "considerable ecchymosis", so it's possible the ecchymosis he saw could only be consistent with a fracture before death, with the blood still flowing. The author of the article says post-mortem bruising is usually a yellowish brown ("bloodless") appearance, but if there is congestion in the cadaver enough blood can escape the vessels to produce a bruise indistinguishable from one occurring shortly before death. So, post-mortem bruising/petechiae that resembles "freckles" could've been caused by moving the body to the Montauk. In regards to the break to the fibula, the reparative phase of bone regeneration begins a few days after the injury, so that should have been detectable during the autopsy: https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/322419.php |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 25 Guest(s)