Identification of Booth's body
|
12-15-2018, 02:23 PM
Post: #240
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Identification of Booth's body
(12-13-2018 09:05 PM)mikegriffith1 Wrote: * Luther Baker did not take off with the man in the barn’s body for several hours for no reason. The Booth-escaped theory does not require us to ignore this bizarre, extremely suspicious event. Rather, we can plausibly theorize that Baker had a very important reason for taking off with the body: to change the clothing, to break the body’s left fibula near the ankle, to slightly burn the back of the body’s neck if necessary (unless the body happened to have a scar on the back of its neck), and possibly to write the initials JWB on one of the hands. I have a medical question. After examining the body on the Montauk, Dr. Barnes wrote Stanton as follows: "The left leg and foot were encased in an appliance of splints and bandages, upon the removal of which, a fracture of the fibula (small bone of the leg) 3 inches above the ankle joint, accompanied by considerable ecchymosis, was discovered." My question - if the break to the fibula occurred after the body was already dead would ecchymosis appear at all? Would it appear to the doctor exactly the same as if the injury had taken place 13 days previous (to a live person) as opposed to a matter of hours (to a person already dead)? Wouldn't there be a big difference on how the two wounds would look to a doctor? |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 31 Guest(s)