Identification of Booth's body
|
11-05-2018, 04:58 PM
(This post was last modified: 11-05-2018 05:29 PM by mikegriffith1.)
Post: #144
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Identification of Booth's body
(11-03-2018 08:42 PM)AussieMick Wrote: Mike, you write "Yet, when the mouth of the body at the 1869 identification was examined, only one filling was found. Surely everyone will admit that it would have been extremely hard not to notice the other filling." Theres plenty of reasons why the body apparently only had 1 filling 4 years after demise... One, forensic sources inform us that teeth take 40-50 years to decompose, since they consist of calcium and other hard substances. You can Google it if you don't believe me. Two, if someone stole the one filling, why would they not have stolen the other filling? Three, Joseph Booth indicated that the filled tooth was found where the dental chart said it should be. This is important because that chart was obviously drawn before the second filling was done. This would mean that if a filling had fallen out, it would have been the new filling that had done so, which seems unlikely. This would also mean that the tooth thief took the older filling and ignored the new one. Four, it is very unlikely that any filling back then would have been "small," due to the fact that electric-powered dental drills did not exist yet. Five, if one of the fillings was small and/or no longer visible (unlikely), or missing, what, then are we to make of the repeated claim that Dr. Merrill came on board the Montauk and identified two fillings in the mouth? And no one at the 1869 viewing, done with a dental chart in hand, mentioned any missing teeth. Six, supposedly, Dr. Barnes told Col. Clarence Cobb that one of the reasons he was not needed as an identification witness on the Montauk was that Dr. Merrill had identified the body as Booth by identifying the two fillings he had done in Booth's mouth (Francis Wilson, John Wilkes Booth: Fact and Fiction of Lincoln's Assassination, p. 199). This is interesting because Cobb would have been a credible ID witness, since he had known Booth for years. Cobb had been sent to the Montauk by Paymaster Benjamin Price to help ID the body. But he was turned away and never viewed the body. Did Barnes lie to keep Cobb from seeing the body? Seven, as mentioned, the filling that was found at the 1869 viewing would have been the older filling, since the other filling was done shortly before the assassination. So the theory that the newer filling had become invisible is illogical and problematic. Below are articles that I found--in a relatively brief search--that talk about cases where family members were able to identify a loved one’s body after the person had been dead for 24-72 hours and longer. Most of the cases involved bodies that were found outdoors. I found these articles while trying to find a case where a body’s appearance changed so drastically from life to death that the body bore “no resemblance” to the living person (Dr. May), where people were “shocked” by the body’s lack of resemblance to the living person (L. Gardner), where a doctor who had operated on the person said that “never in a human being had a greater change taken place” between how the body looked in life and in death (Dr. May), where the body’s “lineaments”—distinctive features, especially of the face—bore “no resemblance” to the person in life, and where the body's face became "much" freckled (Dr. May) and "very much freckled" (L. Gardner) after death. https://www.cecildaily.com/news/state_ne...002e0.html https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/cri...92d59ac3ec https://www.wowt.com/home/headlines/52009492.html https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2006/0...-A_YbAUmpI https://www.kansas.com/news/article1065175.html https://myfox28columbus.com/news/local/b...creek-lake https://www.nbcconnecticut.com/news/loca...76858.html http://archive.boston.com/news/local/art...immigrant/ https://wearemitu.com/mitu-world/el-chap...-tortured/ https://www.pressreader.com/usa/chicago-...2739898798 http://nj1015.com/missing-womans-car-pul...dy-inside/ https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/11/nyreg...ified.html Mike Griffith |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 31 Guest(s)