Otto Eisenschiml's background
|
10-30-2018, 05:41 AM
(This post was last modified: 10-30-2018 05:44 AM by mikegriffith1.)
Post: #5
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Otto Eisenschiml's background
(09-22-2018 05:10 PM)Gene C Wrote:(09-22-2018 03:52 PM)mikegriffith1 Wrote: I believe that if Eisenschiml were alive today and read the research on this issue by Neff, Guttridge, and Arnold, he would change his mind. The Lincoln Conspiracy is an unfortunate mix of a fair amount of valid information ruined by lots of absurd speculation, distortion, and outright fabrication. How was Neff "involved" with Balsiger and Seller's work? As a consultant? Consultants usually can't control the final product and might not agree with much of what the final product says. It is in the same sad category as Finnis Bates' book The Escape and Suicide of John Wilkes Booth. Guttridge and Neff's Dark Union is a serious work of solid scholarship based on years of research, and there is no comparison between it and Balsiger and Seller's book or Bates' book. As for Eisenschiml, readers might want to read his reply to his critics: Reviewers Reviewed: A Challenge to Historical Critics https://archive.org/details/reviewersreviewe00eise Mike Griffith |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
Otto Eisenschiml's background - Steve - 09-11-2018, 06:51 PM
RE: Otto Eisenschiml's background - mikegriffith1 - 09-22-2018, 03:52 PM
RE: Otto Eisenschiml's background - Gene C - 09-22-2018, 05:10 PM
RE: Otto Eisenschiml's background - L Verge - 09-22-2018, 06:33 PM
RE: Otto Eisenschiml's background - mikegriffith1 - 10-30-2018 05:41 AM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)