Blowing up the White House - any interest?

[L Verge]

(10-26-2017 11:55 AM)Steve Wrote:  The usual description of the plan had always seemed unfeasible to me. And looking over Atzerodt's description it doesn't actually say inside or outside but at the end of White House by the War Department.

Although one has to ask, how would they have hoped to have been able to place mines on the lawn, even at night, without anybody noticing?

As I have posted before, Tidwell, Hall and Gaddy asked me to consult with White House historian William Seales back in the 1980s when he had published his history of the mansion. He was then consulting with the gov't. agency that owns Surratt House.

Their question was regarding a "secret" entry point into the WH that could accommodate men transporting munitions. Seales replied that the sewer tunnels at that time were large enough for men to stand upright in them, and that he thought there was a decent possibility that the building could be damaged that way. I don't believe that SSlater (i.e. John Stanton) agrees with that possibility, however.

If my feeble brain remembers correctly, there was a mansion nearby (the Greens' ?) that had similar tunnels that were considered in a previous plan to abduct the President and get him out of town. If such pipes/tunnels were big enough to accommodate men and barrels, it makes sense to me that they might be access points in other large buildings in the city -- and certainly more inconspicuous than men digging holes on the WH lawn.