New Search - HELP
|
07-28-2016, 12:06 PM
Post: #82
|
|||
|
|||
RE: New Search - HELP
(07-23-2016 02:03 PM)Pamela Wrote:(07-03-2016 07:37 AM)Susan Higginbotham Wrote: In the same 1885 interview (in the April 17, 1885 Washington Critic) in which Richards claimed to have been at the theater, he also claimed to have gone to Mary Surratt's house on the evening of the assassination and found her in her usual dress, with no appearance of having retired for the evening. I simply don't believe that Richards would have suppressed such incriminating evidence in 1865 had it been true. Interesting, but given the strange syntax, I think he probably said, or meant to say, "His mother lives here. Is she in?" Compare McDevitt's testimony from the same trial: "Q. Will you state whether on the night of the ]4th of April, 1865, or the morning of the 15th, you took any steps to discover and arrest the assassins of the President? A. I did. I received information that J. Wilkes Booth had fired the shot. Q. Did you go to the house of Mrs. Surratt? A. I did. Q. Who went with you? A. Lientenant Charles M. Skippon, sixth precinct, then sergeant of the precinct, and a squad of his men, Mr. Clarvoe and myself, and Mr. Donaldson, one of our detective officers. Q. State at what time you arrived there, and give as well as you recollect a narrative of the incidents that occurred. A. I think after the bell was rung, a lady [Mrs. Holohan] put her head out of the second story window—that is the window over the parlor—and asked us who it was. We asked for Mrs. Surratt, if she lived there; she said, she did; we said, we wish to come in immediately; the door was then opened by Mr. Weichmann; he was dressed in his shirt sleeves, and I think he was in his stocking feet; his shirt was open in the bosom; I think he had one suspender on, but I am not certain; we asked for John Surratt; he said, he was not at home; we found a shawl lying there in the passage, and asked whose shawl that was. It was covered with mud." It also strikes me as very unlikely that Richards would bring a party of men to the boardinghouse, speak to Mary Surratt, find her behavior and appearance suspicious, and then leave without waking the sleeping Weichmann and the other boarders for questioning. For all Richards knew at that point, the sleeping man might have been John Surratt--and Richards' leaving would give Mary the opportunity to coach the other occupants of the house, especially her daughter, her niece, and Nora Fitzpatrick, in what to tell police in case they returned. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 9 Guest(s)