When was Reverdy Johnson Entered on the Record?

[RobertLC]

This is a return visit to my posting on February 17 regarding when Reverdy Johnson was accepted as Mary Surratt’s counsel.

We know that Pitman was the Recorder to the Commission and his version of the testimony includes this May 12 entry on page 22, “The accused, MARY E. SURRATT, applied for permission to introduce the Hon. Reverdy Johnson as additional counsel for her, A member of the Commission (General T. M. Harris) objected…” Harris subsequently withdrew his objection and Johnson was accepted.

In her book, “The Assassin’s Accomplice,” Kate Larson notes on page 141 that the challenge to Reverdy Johnson occurred on May 12. And Edward Steers, Jr., in his book, “Blood on the Moon,” on page 221, also places the objection to Johnson on May 12.

However, Poore places this action on May 13. Page 51, “The JUDGE ADVOCATE. It is proper that the names of all gentlemen who appear as counsel should be entered on the record. Do I understand Mr. Johnson as appearing for any of these prisoners?” Page 52, “MR. JOHNSON. I do not know whether I shall be able to appear or not. I have taken no part in the case …”

Johnson did not question witnesses on May 12, but Aiken and Clampitt did. Johnson first questioned a witness on May 13 (Louis Weichmann).

Can someone direct me to additional information that confirms which record is correct? Have I missed something? Or have I misunderstood Poore’s account?

Any assistance is greatly appreciated.

Thanks.

Bob