Stupid question?
|
01-21-2016, 04:18 AM
Post: #9
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Stupid question?
(01-19-2016 06:46 PM)L Verge Wrote:(01-19-2016 12:58 PM)loetar44 Wrote: Right Laurie - Michael Schein writes in his "John Surratt: The Lincoln Assassin Who Got Away" how Herold (on March 17, 1865 – the failed kidnapping of Lincoln) was dispatched to pick up Booth’s buggy and head for Surrattsville, carrying with him an arsenal of weapons that Booth had collected. Laurie: I recall the post. My understanding is that Booth obtained the arms and other items, probably in New York, where, according to Arnold, he went often to replenish "his squandering means", because of his "riotous living and dissipation". My surmise is that part of his financing came from Confederate agents in that city and/or Belmont and his circle of Copperheads. In any case, by January, he had the arms and tools he needed and gave them to Arnold and O'Laughlen in Baltimore, who promptly shipped them to Washington. They took up residence at Mary Van Tine's boarding house, at 420 D Street, on or about February 10, so the arms and tools must have been stashed elsewhere for the time being. On the morning of March 18, after the "failed kidnapping attempt", Surratt and Atzerodt went to look for Herold. They found him between Surrattsville and T.B., with the weapons and tools, which had somehow, somewhere, come into his possession (presumably on the 17th, after they had been retrieved by Arnold and O'Laughlen as part of the Campbell Hospital episode). This encounter could not have been entirely by chance. In any case, all three then went to the tavern, where they left everything with Lloyd for later pick-up. See American Brutus, pp. 187, 188. John P.S. Rather than start a new post, I am going to put out a call to everyone for help on an unrelated subject. I hope no one minds my piggybacking on Kees' post. I recall reading somewhere that the Military Commission that tried the conspirators subpoeaned President Andrew Johnson, but that he refused to honor the subpoena and did not appear at the trial. I believe he used "executive privilege" to justify his refusal, which apparently was not contested by the Commission. In any case, I have looked for evidence of this, but have thus far come up empty. Does anyone have a source for this information? It is important to me, because I recently uncovered evidence that sheds light on the mystery of the card from Booth that was left in Browning's box. Knowledge of Johnson's refusal is relevant. Thank you. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
Stupid question? - loetar44 - 01-18-2016, 11:54 AM
RE: Stupid question? - Gene C - 01-18-2016, 12:52 PM
RE: Stupid question? - Eva Elisabeth - 01-18-2016, 01:39 PM
RE: Stupid question? - RJNorton - 01-18-2016, 02:32 PM
RE: Stupid question? - L Verge - 01-25-2016, 10:56 AM
RE: Stupid question? - John Fazio - 02-03-2016, 07:28 AM
RE: Stupid question? - L Verge - 02-03-2016, 07:56 PM
RE: Stupid question? - loetar44 - 01-19-2016, 10:32 AM
RE: Stupid question? - L Verge - 01-19-2016, 11:13 AM
RE: Stupid question? - loetar44 - 01-19-2016, 12:58 PM
RE: Stupid question? - L Verge - 01-19-2016, 06:46 PM
RE: Stupid question? - John Fazio - 01-21-2016 04:18 AM
RE: Stupid question? - JMadonna - 01-21-2016, 08:44 AM
RE: Stupid question? - RJNorton - 01-21-2016, 09:04 AM
RE: Stupid question? - John Fazio - 01-21-2016, 09:29 AM
RE: Stupid question? - L Verge - 01-21-2016, 09:10 AM
RE: Stupid question? - loetar44 - 01-25-2016, 05:13 AM
RE: Stupid question? - Susan Higginbotham - 01-25-2016, 08:39 AM
RE: Stupid question? - loetar44 - 01-25-2016, 11:30 AM
RE: Stupid question? - Susan Higginbotham - 01-25-2016, 01:07 PM
RE: Stupid question? - loetar44 - 01-25-2016, 02:28 PM
RE: Stupid question? - HerbS - 01-25-2016, 04:50 PM
RE: Stupid question? - loetar44 - 02-04-2016, 03:00 PM
RE: Stupid question? - Tom Bogar - 02-04-2016, 04:15 PM
RE: Stupid question? - loetar44 - 02-05-2016, 04:43 AM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)