Louis Weichmann
|
09-19-2015, 08:25 AM
Post: #391
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Louis Weichmann
I think Weichmann's testimony helped, but she would have been convicted without it.
- Her denial of recognizing Lewis Paine in front of the detectives, - Anna's comment about Booth being at the house the day of the assassination, - her trip to the Surratt Tavern (where the guns were hidden) the day of the assassination - John's involvement as a courier and his trips to Richmond and Canada, - the tavern that she owned (and operated only a few months prior) being a meeting place and where several people had been arrested, - the boarding house in Washington being used as a stopping spot for a few of John's courier friends, - Booth's picture being hidden all this worked against her, and would/could be known without Weichmann. Weichmann's testimony only made it a little easier for the feds, he had the details and dates, he had a close relationship with the family, but the feds had plenty of evidence against her without him. The trip to the tavern the day of the assassination was a key event, but only one of many items against her. I agree with Herb, Stanton did what he felt he had to do for justice and to protect the country. From his viewpoint, the country was at a point of crisis. Johnson certainly didn't have the skills to deal with the situation effectively. Seward was disabled. There was no one else but Stanton. I think Mary in one regard was like the others involved, she didn't consider the drastic consequences of her actions. So when is this "Old Enough To Know Better" supposed to kick in? |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 34 Guest(s)