Louis Weichmann
|
07-24-2015, 09:27 AM
Post: #164
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Louis Weichmann
(07-24-2015 04:48 AM)BettyO Wrote:Quote:Is that the exact name of the newspaper? I noticed that the statements attributed to Spangler sounded too educated to be his words. Don't you agree? What do you base "wheedling snoop" on? Are you projecting your own bias? But I agree that those losers had no use for him. He didn't offer them bags of money. Also, do you think beating a woman to be chivalrous? Annie Ward? So two Annie Wards in this story, interesting. I thought he beat the woman up because she was black and he was a white supremacist and felt entitled to do so. Do you think he would have beaten her up if she was a white servant? I wonder what the police report said--that his actions were "strong and uncalled for"? And he viciously and murderously attacked an unarmed, bedridden man three times his age and attempted to kill anyone who got in his way. How in the world can you call Powell chivalrous? HerbS, why wouldn't Weichmann protect himself? And why wouldn't he want justice for Lincoln and Seward, for Seward's family and for the nation? The Surratts recklessly, intentionally and without conscience put him in highly suspicious situations. Because John Surratt, in a lecture riddled with self serving lies, said that Weichmann wanted to join the conspiracy--"most folk" believe him? No, there's more, right? The dot dot dot story. Weichmann knew more than he let on.... |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 29 Guest(s)