James Swanson in the Wall Street Journal
|
04-23-2015, 06:16 PM
Post: #3
|
|||
|
|||
RE: James Swanson in the Wall Street Journal
While I don't pretend to know much about the inner politics of the republican party in 1864, I always found the choice of Andrew Johnson as the VP running mate beyond my comprehension. Johnson was a Southern Democrat who stayed in the Union, and the only thing I can see that AL would want him as a running mate in 1864 was that he was from Tennessee and was loyal to the Union. Am I missing something? Otherwise, I think James Swanson's assessment is pretty much on the mark.
|
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
James Swanson in the Wall Street Journal - Rsmyth - 04-23-2015, 10:05 AM
RE: James Swanson in the Wall Street Journal - RJNorton - 04-23-2015, 11:06 AM
RE: James Swanson in the Wall Street Journal - Jim Garrett - 04-23-2015 06:16 PM
RE: James Swanson in the Wall Street Journal - LincolnToddFan - 04-24-2015, 09:48 AM
RE: James Swanson in the Wall Street Journal - L Verge - 04-24-2015, 10:40 AM
RE: James Swanson in the Wall Street Journal - LincolnToddFan - 04-24-2015, 11:09 AM
RE: James Swanson in the Wall Street Journal - L Verge - 04-24-2015, 12:12 PM
RE: James Swanson in the Wall Street Journal - Gene C - 04-24-2015, 11:10 AM
RE: James Swanson in the Wall Street Journal - LincolnToddFan - 04-24-2015, 12:59 PM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)