Did JWB visit Mary's boarding house after the assassination?

[Pamela]

(02-23-2015 05:25 PM)RobertLC Wrote:  It is obvious that somewhere along the line, Weichman lied. He stated clearly in his testimony on May 13, 1865 that he did not know who the visitor was at the Surratt boarding house the night of April 14, 1865. But in his affidavit, that Roger posted, he says, “The following facts, which have come to my recollection since the rendition of my testimony…” and then he goes on to identify that visitor at Booth. And, as Roger reported, Weichman also identified Booth as the visitor in his later book.

I think that if, on August 11, 1865, he knew Booth was the visitor then, on May 13, 1865, he also knew it. So when did he lie?

Did he try to protect Mary Surratt by not identifying Booth during his testimony? Or did he just jump on the bandwagon and, in his later writings, say that he knew it was Booth?

Regarding Gene’s question that started this thread, the evidence seems to support a visit from Booth prior to the shooting rather than after.

I imagine Booth was riding his horse pretty hard heading toward the Old Navy Yard Bridge to escape the City. Stops along the way would have been detrimental to his escape. Actually, Cobb noticed that the horse had been run hard.

Bob

It's possible that Weichmann wanted to protect Anna Surratt in the first trial. The conversation in the parlor after the detectives left was witnessed by Miss Fitzgerald and Miss Jenkins.

I can't remember where I read it, but I believe there was a statement by one of the young ladies at the supper table, that Anna, not Mrs. Surratt answered the door at 9:00. I also read somewhere that I can't remember that Anna accompanied her mother into the Herndon House where Powell was staying but Weichmann said it was only Mary.