"Frank the Mank" on Historical Research
|
11-01-2014, 08:15 AM
Post: #6
|
|||
|
|||
RE: "Frank the Mank" on Historical Research
(10-29-2014 10:34 PM)wpbinzel Wrote: The point of my post is that just because someone wrote something about someone -- whether it was last week or 150 years ago -- it does not necessarily mean that it was true. That is the challenge of historical research. Very true. I have been trying to come up with a way that works for me to weight sources. One of the important criteria is corroboration. The hard part, as you said, is to determine whether a statement is actually corroborated or if a bad source has just been repeated again and again without examination. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
"Frank the Mank" on Historical Research - wpbinzel - 10-29-2014, 05:49 PM
RE: "Frank the Mank" on Historical Research - L Verge - 10-29-2014, 06:08 PM
RE: "Frank the Mank" on Historical Research - BettyO - 10-29-2014, 06:10 PM
RE: "Frank the Mank" on Historical Research - Anita - 10-29-2014, 09:22 PM
RE: "Frank the Mank" on Historical Research - wpbinzel - 10-29-2014, 10:34 PM
RE: "Frank the Mank" on Historical Research - STS Lincolnite - 11-01-2014 08:15 AM
RE: "Frank the Mank" on Historical Research - Linda Anderson - 11-01-2014, 11:17 AM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)