** NEW DISCOVERY REGARDING BOOTH AUTOPSY PHOTO
|
06-17-2013, 11:02 AM
Post: #61
|
|||
|
|||
RE: ** NEW DISCOVERY REGARDING BOOTH AUTOPSY PHOTO
(06-10-2013 09:06 PM)John E. Wrote: Hi folks, John, The name James Wardell was not an uncommon name in the 1860s. That's just based on brief on-line search of Ohio census records. In fact there is a James Wardell in the 1860 census living in Carrol (sp), Ohio who was 22 years old. Probably not the guy, but who knows? I guess the starting presumtion must be that he did exist and the letter quoted in Katz's book is not a fabrication. How is it that you went about disproving he existed and/or the letter was genuine? If he was a fiction created by Ollroyd or Katz, what do you think their motive was for fabricating evidence that supported a photo had been taken? |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 22 Guest(s)