Robert E Lee The Great Emancipator
|
06-12-2013, 04:11 PM
(This post was last modified: 06-12-2013 04:37 PM by brtmchl.)
Post: #90
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Robert E Lee The Great Emancipator
(06-12-2013 06:02 AM)LincolnMan Wrote:(06-11-2013 09:43 PM)Thomas Thorne Wrote:(06-07-2013 12:30 PM)william l. richter Wrote: Robert E. Lee: The Great EmanciaptorIt is fascinating how the actions and even the triumphs of famous men and women often produce consequences that would have horrified them. Did Lee ever rue his military successes? Napoleon, who was certainly no Jeffersonian,was described as an "unwitting champion of democracy." Perhaps the ultimate in carrying this line of thought to ridiculousness was Randolph Churchill,the truly obnoxious son of Winston Churchill. Randolph stunned the city fathers of Tel Aviv by suggesting they build a statue of Hitler on the grounds that they owed the existence of Israel to the greatest anti -semite in history. I also agree with you Tom It does make one wonder why the Confederacy did not create Liberation Fronts, resorting in terrorism or small bands continuing to conduct guerrilla warfare like so many South American countries still do today. As well as many liberation movements in the Middle East or Eastern Europe. Does anyone have a thought about this? I find it interesting that a Rebellion wouls just ceas. Was it the overly generous terms of surrender that Lee accepted from Grant. " To go back home to their families and live in peace. unmolested." And the "Honor" of the time period kept their deal intact? Was it the sheer devastation that the Southern people were facing from the North's policies after Emmancipation to conquer the South. And the system of "Total War" that was sweeping the South in the wake of Vicksburg? War it war wearisome? Was it States Rights? It was difficult for Davis to create a Confedrate Nation while still having one leg tied to States Rights. Was there never a solid ideal of Nationalism? I have heard this arguement before and don't agree with it simply because, Guerrilla bands did not spring up in different areas of the South trying to further the war. I think a Southern Nationalism was present. Was it General Lee himself? "Obedience to lawful authority is the foundation of manly character," - Robert E. Lee. Lee resisted calls by some officers to reject surrender and allow small units to melt away into the mountains, setting up a lengthy guerrilla war. He insisted the war was over and energetically campaigned for inter-sectional reconciliation. "So far from engaging in a war to perpetuate slavery, I am rejoiced that slavery is abolished. I believe it will be greatly for the interests of the South."[79] - from wikipedia I think in the end it was honor. We fought, we did our best, we have accepted defeat, and we will comply with the terms we have made. Lee was a true leader even after the war. I know that it would have been better for everyone, had Lincoln lived and Lee knew that as well. He spoke often, supporting Johnson's Reconstruction plans knowing that Radical Republicans would hurt the South as we know inevitably happened. Lee in a letter claimed paternalistic concern for the welfare of freed Southern blacks, stating that "The idea that the Southern people are hostile to the negroes and would oppress them, if it were in their power to do so, is entirely unfounded. They have grown up in our midst, and we have been accustomed from childhood to look upon them with kindness." " Any man who thinks he can be happy and prosperous by letting the American Government take care of him; better take a closer look at the American Indian." - Henry Ford |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)