|
01-20-2020, 12:17 PM,
|
|
|
RJNorton
Hero Member
      
|
Posts: 13,229
Threads: 556
Joined: Jun 2012
|
|
|
RE: Tad photo?
Despite the definite similarity, I am not sure, but leaning somewhat toward a "no." Provenance is key when it comes to photos like this, and in the description it says, "We assume it was during his time at the Capitol that Crounse acquired the photograph, possibly gifted to him by the First Lady." To me, anyway, this provenance is not enough to say the boy is definitely Tad.
|
|
|
|
01-20-2020, 02:11 PM,
|
|
|
LincolnMan
Hero Member
      
|
Posts: 5,433
Threads: 161
Joined: Jul 2012
|
|
RE: Tad photo?
(01-20-2020, 12:17 PM)RJNorton Wrote: Despite the definite similarity, I am not sure, but leaning somewhat toward a "no." Provenance is key when it comes to photos like this, and in the description it says, "We assume it was during his time at the Capitol that Crounse acquired the photograph, possibly gifted to him by the First Lady." To me, anyway, this provenance is not enough to say the boy is definitely Tad.
Agree. It does look like him though.
Bill Nash
|
|
|
|
01-20-2020, 04:49 PM,
|
|
|
|
RE: Tad photo?
It certainly looks like him to me.
|
|
|
01-20-2020, 05:34 PM,
(This post was last modified: 01-20-2020, 05:44 PM by Anita.)
|
|
|
Anita
Legendary Member
     
|
Posts: 1,616
Threads: 94
Joined: Jul 2013
|
|
RE: Tad photo?
There is good resemblance to Tad but the weak provenance is what bothered me.
I Googled Corporal Amos Crounse. The Tad photo might have been part of this collection auctioned by the Oakridge Auction Gallery in Virginia.
Lot 31
Corporal Amos Crounse Archive - 152nd NY Inf.
https://www.oakridgeauctiongallery.com/details/862
|
|
|
|
01-20-2020, 05:56 PM,
|
|
|
Steve
Legendary Member
     
|
Posts: 1,670
Threads: 139
Joined: Jan 2017
|
|
RE: Tad photo?
The boy in the photo kind of looks like Tad... but the uniform the boy is wearing doesn't match the uniform Tad is wearing in the Brady and Gardner photos.
Here's a link to the Wikimedia Commons page with photos of Tad from the National Archives:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Tad_Lincoln
Tad's uniform has dark blue pants (matching the shirt color) with gold stripes running down the pant legs. The boy in the photo has a lighter shade of blue pants than Tad's with a (thicker) dark blue stripe (possibly red?) running down the leg. Tad's cap has the US wreath officer's crest while the boy has no cap crest. Tad's uniform has a three star general rank shoulder rank insignia while the boy doesn't appear to wear any rank insignia. The boy's uniform also has shoulder straps that are missing from Tad's uniform
|
|
|
01-20-2020, 07:11 PM,
(This post was last modified: 01-20-2020, 07:13 PM by Anita.)
|
|
|
Anita
Legendary Member
     
|
Posts: 1,616
Threads: 94
Joined: Jul 2013
|
|
RE: Tad photo?
Steve, I agree the uniforms don't match up. Knowing Tad and how proud he was to be a Buckskin soldier, a generic wouldn't do. Then again, Tad is said to have had several uniforms.
Is the uniform referred to here the same as the one Stanton had made?
"1. When 9-year-old Tad Lincoln first came with his family to live on the grounds of the Soldiers’ Home in the summer of 1862, he was lonely. He was in mourning for his older brother Willie, his best friend and playmate, who had died earlier that year.
2. The Presidential security guard, Co. K of the 150 Pennsylvania Volunteer Infantry also known as the “Bucktail” Soldiers, who resided in tents on the grounds, helped to lift Tad’s spirits by welcoming him into their midst. One sergeant recalled that Tad
became “a great favorite of the company.”
3. As an “honorary” Bucktail soldier, Tad was issued a small military uniform and was given the unofficial title of “Third Lieutenant.” Tad drilled and shared meals with the soldiers. At the end of the day, he often came home quite dirty from these activities and
from the soot of the campfires, much to his mother Mary’s dismay." https://www.lincolncottage.org/10-things...iers-home/
The auction image date for the photo is vague. "We believe this image was taken early in the war, circa 1862."
|
|
|
|