10-02-2012, 11:55 AM,
(This post was last modified: 10-02-2012, 12:02 PM by Christine.)
|
|
|
Christine
Senior Member
   
|
Posts: 119
Threads: 36
Joined: Jul 2012
|
|
Slavery
I just found my husband's ggg grandfather's probate records (coincidentally named John Booth). He lived in Alabama, and we knew he had a few slaves. I thought I understood the emotions of that time mixed with our time and the effect it had on me. I thought I was 'open minded' enough to not judge him based on today's standards.
I found the page listing the 'negros' and their 'value.' (1864) The adult males were 'valued' at $3500. Then I saw the value for the little 'negro' boy - William Thomas - $500. It hit me so hard when I saw that John's horse ($800) was 'valued' more than the little boy! A child who had no more 'value' than a horse. I felt like somebody punched me. I thought about my own children and grandchildren, and wondered how I would have felt had someone given them a value of less than an animal! https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH...Z:84657420
A few pages later were records of his guardianship of his step children and the process of settling their estate from their late father. Their 'negros' were to be hired for the benefit of the children. But included in the advertisement for the hire were many conditions; "the highest bidder and persons hiring said negros will be bound to give said negros two new suits of cotton cloths and one suit of wool cloths one pair of new shoes one new blanket and wool hat, said negros shall not be carried out of the county nor be carried into any sickly place. person hiring shall pay all doctor bills that may be necessary for the health of said negros and they shall not be treated with any cruel punishment. any person or persons hiring of said negros and not complying with these obligations shall be liable to damages in all cases. 8th day of January 1849." https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH...Z:84657420
I want to hope that the humane conditions were based on kindness, charity, and love, and not an economic necessity. . .
Do you think we will ever truly understand slavery and its impact on everybody - not just the slaves, but the owners, the abolitionists, the fence sitters - and us?
|
|
|
|
10-03-2012, 12:44 AM,
|
|
|
Rob Wick
Hero Member
      
|
Posts: 3,038
Threads: 196
Joined: Jul 2012
|
|
|
RE: Slavery
Gene,
You'll get absolutely no argument from me that other nations have committed heinous acts, but I don't think we can take any solace that other nations imported more slaves. Part of the reason we didn't need to was that they were propagating themselves into the population. Plus, it has always struck me as odd that other nations were able to abolish slavery without fighting a bloody war, yet we couldn't. It also seems to have lingered far too long into our national psyche, especially since it took 100 years to guarantee blacks the right to vote.
Best
Rob
Abraham Lincoln is the only man, dead or alive, with whom I could have spent five years without one hour of boredom.--Ida M. Tarbell
I want the respect of intelligent men, but I will choose for myself the intelligent.
--Carl Sandburg
|
|
|
|
10-03-2012, 12:20 PM,
|
|
|
Rob Wick
Hero Member
      
|
Posts: 3,038
Threads: 196
Joined: Jul 2012
|
|
|
RE: Slavery
I don't know that I would see it as a question of feeling guilty. I read Taylor Branch's three-volume history of the Civil Rights movement and the life of Martin Luther King, and the one feeling I consistently came away with was how something like this can never happen again in a country that claims in its founding document that all men are created equal. I think it requires a constant understanding of what happened in the past, with the necessary praise for accomplishments made to overcome it, but I think as a society we are far from overcoming it completely, and unless we vigilantly remember what happened, we do a grave disservice to those who fought and the many who died.
Best
Rob
Abraham Lincoln is the only man, dead or alive, with whom I could have spent five years without one hour of boredom.--Ida M. Tarbell
I want the respect of intelligent men, but I will choose for myself the intelligent.
--Carl Sandburg
|
|
|
10-04-2012, 08:03 AM,
(This post was last modified: 10-04-2012, 08:12 AM by MaddieM.)
|
|
|
MaddieM
Forum Master
    
|
Posts: 433
Threads: 45
Joined: Aug 2012
|
|
RE: Slavery
I found this quite by accident. I found it interesting, in that, if this is anything to go by, the North seemed to have a form of apartheid going on despite fighting for the abolition of slavery.
Someone has asked about Native Americans fighting in the Civil War. Here is the answer.
Hopefully, this is within the deadline. The answer is, no one really knows for sure. In 1863, in the Union Army, Native American's were typically classified as 'Colored Troops', and not allowed, for the most part, to serve with 'White' units. There are only a few known examples of Native Americans serving in the Union Army at Gettysburg, (and the only reason I know about them is from reading 'Civil War Times' magazine.
On the Confederate side, there were numerous American Indians serving in units from Texas (Hoods Brigade), but the Confederates did not classify Native Americans by race (oddly enough), nor did they classify hispanics by race, either. Therefore, while we know these people served, and no doubt were at Gettysburg, proving it is a different matter.
Most of the 'all Native American' units served in the TransMississippi Theatre during the war, in places like Georgia, Alabama, Missouri, and such.
http://en.allexperts.com/q/U-S-History-6...ysburg.htm
"Fourscore and seven years ago our father brought forth, upon this continent, a new nation, conceived in liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal."
This statement is completely at odds with what was perpetrated on the Native Americans.
|
|
|
|