05-08-2014, 08:40 AM,
(This post was last modified: 05-08-2014, 12:27 PM by Eva Elisabeth.)
|
|
|
Eva Elisabeth
Hero Member
      
|
Posts: 6,598
Threads: 69
Joined: Apr 2013
|
|
RE: Historical Cosmo Girls
That is my favorite, too. ("What your friends may not be telling you" applies as well to "Is this color/outfit becoming to me?" and all these questions.)
As for "Brunettes - Why They're better" - since one colleague of mine makes sure I won't ever miss the latest stupid-blue-eyed-blondes joke (but most are really funny), I once confronted him (to no avail) with the "blondes-will-die-out" hoax ( http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/2284783.stm ) that occasionally reappeares. (Usually people begin to cherish what - they fear - they are going to lose, but he pictured me in a sort of Brave-New-World Savage Reservation).
However, this hoax was indeed first published in the following 1865 article* approving of recent Parisian fashion changes favoring the blonde look dates rumors concerning the extinction of the blondes:
"GOLDEN HAIR
Not long ago, the admirers of blue eyes and fair hair were disgusted by certain wise men announcing that the blonde was becoming rapidly extinct, failing to hold her own even in her native North. Let them take heart and rejoice, and laugh to scorn the evil prophecies of Darwinian doctrinaires. Fashion, in Paris, has determined to thwart the disciples of the new school, and set natural selection at defiance, and the fiat has gone forth that the blonde is the true type of beauty, and golden your only hair. Amber-colored locks are literally worth their weight in gold, and all the hair-markets of Europe are being ransacked to enable Parisian belles to witch mankind with beauty not their own, except by right of purchase."
(*"The Flag of Our Union", Aug.26, 1865)
|
|
|
|
05-08-2014, 01:01 PM,
|
|
|
Linda Anderson
Legendary Member
     
|
Posts: 1,085
Threads: 99
Joined: Jul 2012
|
|
RE: Historical Cosmo Girls
Fascinating post, Eva! I wonder how far back this preference for blondes really goes.
I posted a while back that I went to a lecture on Civil War women and the lecturer said that Varina Davis was not considered attractive in her time. We've advanced in our perceptions of beauty since then, for example, Angelina Jolie is considered beautiful, but I remember the ads that asked, "Is it true blondes have more fun?"
Varina Davis
|
|
|
05-08-2014, 02:33 PM,
(This post was last modified: 05-08-2014, 03:10 PM by Linda Anderson.)
|
|
|
Linda Anderson
Legendary Member
     
|
Posts: 1,085
Threads: 99
Joined: Jul 2012
|
|
RE: Historical Cosmo Girls
One thing leads to another and I looked up Jefferson Davis's first wife, Sarah Knox Taylor. She was the daughter of future President Zachary Taylor. Davis resigned from the army to be able to marry her but she died of malaria on September 15, 1835 after only three months of marriage.
"Davis was devastated by the death of his young wife, as were her parents...When Jefferson Davis married Varina Banks Howell on February 26, 1845, he insisted that the newlywed couple visit Sarah's grave during their honeymoon."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarah_Knox_Taylor
Sarah Knox Taylor
|
|
|
05-08-2014, 05:03 PM,
(This post was last modified: 05-08-2014, 05:07 PM by BettyO.)
|
|
|
BettyO
Hero Member
      
|
Posts: 3,596
Threads: 266
Joined: Jul 2012
|
|
|
RE: Historical Cosmo Girls
....and redheads were considered to be "undesirable" and "unfortunate" in the Victorian era. Remember the 1890s fiery tempered redheaded heroine, "Anne Shirley" of Anne of Green Gables and her attempt to dye her hair?
Earlier in medieval times, redheads (or "Gingers" as the Brits call them) were thought to be witches, vampires and ghouls!
Strangely enough, redheads were seemingly extremely popular in Pre-Raphaelite paintings, influenced in part by artist Dante Gabriel Rossetti's flame haired model and later wife, Elizabeth Siddal.
"The Past is a foreign country...they do things differently there" - L. P. Hartley
|
|
|
|