Can I rant for a minute? - Printable Version +- Lincoln Discussion Symposium (https://rogerjnorton.com/LincolnDiscussionSymposium) +-- Forum: Lincoln Discussion Symposium (/forum-1.html) +--- Forum: Other (/forum-10.html) +--- Thread: Can I rant for a minute? (/thread-157.html)

Can I rant for a minute? - Rob Wick - 08-01-2012 08:16 PM Well, not really a rant...just a heavy sigh. I think I might have mentioned that I was turned down for a grant from the National Endowment for the Humanities Summer Stipend program which would have provided $6,000 to help defray research costs. My biggest need is for money to pay researchers, or repositories, for material. I got an e-mail today from the Newberry Library in Chicago which holds correspondence between Sandburg and Oliver Barrett. There are almost 400 pieces in this collection, which will cost just over $360 to get copied. Now that is NOT unreasonable, especially given that I can't go to Chicago for that amount, and hiring a researcher would only add their fees to the copying charges which the library collects. Knox College in Galesburg will provide material for me for about $200, which again is not unreasonable. But I imagine you can smell a trend here. $300 here and $200 there (and one can only guess what else will pop up in the future) and all of a sudden, as Everett McKinley Dirksen once said, you're talking about real money. My rant (or sigh) comes in what was funded by the NEH. Now, to be fair, the NEH got about 1,000 applications and was only able to fund 89. Why we in this country cannot provide more help to our artists and writers bugs the heck out of me, but that's a rant for another day. So, what was funded? Take a gander. Citizenship and Street Vendors' Associations in Post-Abolition Rio de Janeiro, 1889-1930 Vinculum societatis, or, The tie of good company: Keyboard Instruments in Restoration Cultural Practice Visual Fieldnotes from Fort Rupert: Studies of Kwakiutl Dance and Movement by Franz Boas Polemical Humor at the Start of the French Wars of Religion The World Dances Through Manhattan: International Influences on American Concert Dance, 1943-1960 Now, please don't get me wrong. I'm not saying that these aren't necessarily worthy of further study, but the majority of these are so esoteric that they will never be known outside of their author and maybe one or two others. And, to be fair, there were some projects funded that definitely are worthy, such as Understanding the Emotional and Spiritual Journeys of Hospice Volunteers: A Humanistic Inquiry. Speaking as one who lost my mother to cancer, I think such a study has great merit. But what makes these more worthy than my study, or the other 908 that were rejected? The NEH sends all grant applications to outside referees for comments. Let me close with the comments I received on my application, including one that was arrogant and just plain rude. First the positive ones. The rankings are Excellent, Very Good, Good, Some Merit and Not Competitive. Panelist 1 A very well chosen subject, of appeal to several constituencies, as the applicant points out. He clearly uinderstands Carl Sandburg, Abraham Lincoln, academic historians, and the American public all very well. This work can make a significant contribution to assessing the relationship between academic and popular history. Rating: E Panelist 2 This exploration of poet Carl Sandburg's multi-volume biography of Abraham Lincoln and the conflicted relationship Sandburg had with professional historians explores the controversies surrounding Sandburg's role as an amateur historian and public intellectual who sought to document and commemorate Lincoln's life. The projects pivots on historian James G. Randall's public reversal of judgement about the Sandburg biography. Yet, it is not completely clear, given the quotations cited, that Randal fully reversed his judgement of Sandburg's work. Nor is it clear why this should be the focus of the analysis. The tension between professional historians and popular writers seems to offer a more interesting perspectives on the challenges of public humanities as raised by Sandburg's work. Rating: SM Panelist 3 This is a compelling proposal on many levels. Aside from the wide interest in Lincoln and Sandburg themselves, Wick's project of exploring the divide between professional historians and the perception of history written and produced by non-professional historians is important and well-framed in the proposal. I also find the work plan focused and compelling, recognizing the importance of hiring researchers at multiple smaller archives traveling to each of these sites would be prohibitive. Rating: VG Now the less positive one. This project raises interesting questions about the relationship between popular history and academic history, and it will undoubtedly hold some interest for Lincoln scholars. However, the questions of Sandburg’s approach and process seem limited in their significance. Although Mr. Wick has published in small scholarly journals, I am concerned that he has only a BA in History, and I question whether he is qualified to offer a fair evaluation of the approaches and standards of academic historians given his limited professional training. Rating: SM Sigh. Best Rob RE: Can I rant for a minute? - L Verge - 08-01-2012 08:47 PM Yet another example, Rob, of the age-old fight between "academic" historians and "amateur" historians. Unfortunately, the letters MA and PhD after your name and a teaching position at a college or university seem to be what earns one credence. It is very sad, especially when we all know some excellent "amateurs" who do the work on their own without the benefit of research assistants, etc. Such is life in the history field, supposedly. I am also not a fan of NEH or its equivalents in many state levels. You see a great disparity between the funding of the "arts" and the funding of historical and similar projects. And, unfortunately, when the budget is tight, the Humanities Councils are what take the hit. If you are in the history museums field, you can forget it. They start ignoring you first. Personally, I think you should call this a rant. You have every reason to. I'm sorry for your disappointment. Have you checked with any history departments to see if there are worthy students looking for research experience as interns - preferably free internships? RE: Can I rant for a minute? - Rob Wick - 08-01-2012 08:51 PM I've got some feelers out and have some friends who live near places willing to help, but I really don't want to inconvenience them any more than necessary. That is why having Tarbell's papers online has been such a wonderful thing. Best Rob RE: Can I rant for a minute? - Gene C - 08-02-2012 10:33 AM Rob, As my new internet friend I want to encourage you to keep trying. You have lots of fans that want you to succeed. I hope Roger doesn't mind me mentioning this, but he had a setback that eventually contributed to the creation of this forum. Good things can come through adversity. Hang in there and remember that people care. RE: Can I rant for a minute? - Rob Wick - 08-02-2012 10:39 AM Thanks for the kind words, Gene. I sincerely appreciate it. By the way, Droopy (my research assistant, shown here after a hard day of work) says to tell Fido hello. Uploaded with ImageShack.us Best Rob